Erik Carlson (erik@erik.co.uk)
Sat, 10 Oct 1998 10:55:56 +0100
Not that is helps but i have encountered the exact same problem with the
DFHSS2W in my ans 500, seems like the only solution may be to replace the
drive with a vanilla flavour.
Unless anyone else has any better ideas,
Cheers
Erik
>Hi All,
>
>I just got an ANS 700, and have run into a problem with the IBM DFHSS4W
>drive that was provided with the machine. The drive works fine under
>AIX, but won't let me boot linux.
>
>Using the dusers installer.coff or vmlinux.coff, during the boot process,
>the kernel recognizes the drive, spins it up, and then gives me a series
>of repeating error messages:
>
>ncr53c825a-0-<2,0>: M_REJECT received (2:8).
>ncr53c825a-0: SCSI phase error fixup: CCB already dequeued (0xc4fd9020)
>SCSI host 0 abort (pid 54) timed out - resetting
>SCSI bus is being reset for host 0 channel 0.
>ncr53c8xx_reset: pid=54 reset_flags=2 serial_number=98
>serial_number_at_timeout=98
>ncr53c825a-0: restart (scsi reset).
>ncr53c825a-0-<2,0>: phase change 6-7 >ncr53c825a-0-<2,0>: phase change 6-7 7@04fd94c8 resid=4.
>
>...(and it loops back to the M_REJECT message again)
>
>If I disconnect the internal wide drive, and boot with an external narrow
>scsi drive, the machine boots ok, and the internal cdrom works correctly.
>(haven't tried the tape drive yet)
>
>Any suggestions on what I can do to solve this?
>
>I've also read some suggestions that you can do an installation on the
>external bus and then move the drive internal. Is there a way to hook a
>wide drive to the external scsi bus, and if so, what cables would I need
>to do it?
>
>Thanks much,
>
>kris
>
>Kris Noland
>Partner
>Primordial Software
>kris@primordialsoft.com
-- Erik Carlson (erik@erik.co.uk) http://www.erik.co.uk-- "DOS Computers manufactured by companies such as IBM, Compaq, Tandy, and millions of others are by far the most popular, with about 70 million machines in use worldwide. Macintosh fans, on the other hand, may note that cockroaches are far more numerous than humans, and that numbers alone do not denote a higher life form."New York Times, November 26, 1991
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Dec 10 1998 - 16:55:57 PST